Immigration Follow up

In my previous blog post, I explained why I personally don’t have many unanswered questions that concern immigration. However, that fact has changed once I explored the historic problematic of immigration in the U.S. in class. I was mostly intrigued – of course – by the question of whether immigration helps economic development. This is because my previous knowledge of how standard economic models apply to structural economic changes that happen during waves of immigration was challenged.

To further explain what exact part of what I knew was challenged, there are a few terms we need to make sure everyone understands. First, financial incentive. Now, we are all familiar with the definition of an incentive. It is something that gives a person motivation to act. A financial incentive is more or less the same, except it only concerns acts of financial nature and includes not only individuals as actors, but also larger institutional structures, like governments. The second important term to define is the multiplier effect. This economic phenomenon basically describes an increase in profit from new government spending. The final effects of this process are what I was familiar with before discussing the unit in depth.

In context, when a large immigration wave occurs in a nation state there is a rise of demand in the job market. In accordance with the ‘Supply and demand’ model, a rise of demand results in a shortage – in this case, the shortage of job places. When there is such a shortage in a country, the government of that country has financial incentive to support its industries to create space in the job market, because otherwise many unproductive inhabitants create economic stagnation. This financial incentive usually materialized into the multiplier effect. Injections of spending into a country’s companies to create more incentive for those companies to scale up, maximizing their profit, as they could produce and sell more product. By scaling up, companies create a bigger supply of job places for incoming flows of immigrants to fill up, without jeopardizing the native population’s need to be employed. This scenario creates a win-win situation for the state, which prevents economic stagnation and creates growth in the long run, since the economic equilibrium is moved upward, as demonstrated in the image below.

(The image provides the example of energy supplies, instead of job places)


That means the nation can profit off of a bigger number of collected company income taxes, effectively paying back the amount it gave to the industries to scale up.

The way this was challenged by looking into the information about US immigration is when I read an article in our primary sources assignment that said that economic growth from immigration is virtually non-existent. The only visible differences in growth were 0.1% increases. Why? Well, I don’t know. It may be because the US has a larger job market that not even government spending injections can widen it. It may be because of the sheer mass of the population, which just too big in comparison with countries like Germany, who can experience growth of up to around 4-5% because of immigration. Because of that, there may be a lack of financial incentive in the government so the multiplier effect can’t even occur.

Without looking even more into the specific macroeconomic policies of the US government, there is only so much we can do – speculate.


4 thoughts on “Immigration Follow up

  1. The fact that the United States does not show the positive statistics that are projected according to economic models is an interesting point you raise Christian. Perhaps, it’s because the U.S. already relies so heavily on immigrants, specifically Mexican and Hispanic immigrants, to fill an existing demand in the job market in agriculture and domestic labor. Thus, the government does not need to spend to create a job market for our immigrants. Just some food for thought – Sonia


    • Hey Sonia! First of all, thanks for your comment. I definitely agree with your statement. However, Germany also heavily relies on immigrants – especially Turks who mostly immigrated into the country in the twentieth century. How is the U.S. different then?


  2. Hi, Christian, I think analyzing immigration from a financial incentive perspective is really impressive. And your graph of Supply v. Demand effectively helps to explain your points as well. Theorically, immigration should be economically benefit to U.S, however, on the contrary, this doesn’t work the way as we expected. I’m thinking what actually happened on immigration job market is that as the demand of jobs increases, the average salary generally decreases because usually immigrants get paid less, therefore, overall the economy doesn’t grow much because of immigrants. The reason that Germany’s economy grows rapidly due to immigration is because the German government has restricted regulation for immigration, specifically they selected STEM immigrants who can work in big companies, earning handsome salaries and creating big “profit” for the nation. As technology is one of the most important ways to increase nation’s real GDP, therefore high educated STEM major immigrants will best serve for nation’s financial incentives. I’m a big fan of economics, it’s really a fresh aspect to view immigration, and I would really like to hear back from you.


    • Thanks for your reply Kitty! You’ve really made some great observations in comparing how Germany and the U.S. “select” immigrants that are admitted. Economics is really a fun topic and especially when you get into real world impacts of it. A follow up question I would pose after reading your comment would be whether the U.S. should start doing something similar to Germany? And whether that wouldn’t anger the U.S. population currently working in STEM areas?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s